Report on a head-on collision involving a heavy goods vehicle (HGV) and a passenger car on the fv. 24 road near Vallset in Stange municipality, 27 April 2023
Road traffic report 2024/04
Three people were fatally injured, and one was critically injured when a passenger car crossed over to the oncoming lane in a right-hand curve and collided head on with an HGV. The NSIA cannot determine why the passenger car crossed over to the oncoming lane and collided with the HGV, but the investigation has shown that rumble strips on the road could have contributed to prevent the accident. The collision forces in this accident were massive, but the investigation has shown the importance of the passive safety in the vehicle, efficient rescue work and good medical treatment for the surviving passenger. In addition, the investigation has shown that it is important to position the seat belt correctly at the hip and to use a protective net between the trunk and compartment.
Accident site. Photo: NSIA
In the evening of Thursday 27 April 2023, an HGV drove southbound on road fv. 24 in Stange municipality in Innlandet county. At the same time, a Volvo V60 passenger car with four people drove northbound on road fv. 24. The weather at the time of the accident was overcast and the road surface was dry. In a right-hand curve the passenger car crossed over to the oncoming lane and collided head on with the HGV. The HGV then pushed the passenger car backwards about 34 m before both vehicles stopped. In the passenger car the driver, the passenger in the front seat and the passenger in the rear right seat were fatally injured, while the passenger in the rear left seat was critically injured. The driver of the HGV was unharmed.
The NSIA cannot determine why the passenger car did not follow the road’s alignment, crossed over to the oncoming lane and collided with the HGV. There is no reliable information available about what happened inside the passenger car in the last seconds before the accident. Based on a compilation of the factual information, the NSIA considers the most possible explanation to be a moment of inattention from the driver. Falling asleep or indisposition are considered less probable.
Everyone in the passenger car used seatbelts. There was no survival room in the front seats of the car but there was survival room for the two passengers in the rear seat. However, the collision forces in this accident were so massive that the NSIA has asked the question of how it was possible for one person to survive. The passive safety in the vehicle, in addition to efficient rescue work and good medical treatment, contributed to the survival of the passenger in the rear left seat, despite the massive forces in the collision. A better positioned seat belt at the hip could possibly have reduced the extent of the injuries to this passenger. A protective net was installed between the car’s trunk and compartment which obstructed luggage from being thrown forward. The protective net could however have relieved the rear seat back somewhat more if it had been installed according to the instructions.
The speed limit was 80 km/h, and the road appeared relatively new. Innlandet County Authority had established reinforced centreline road marking (sinusoidal rumble strips) on road fv. 24, but because of the road’s proximity to housings and out of consideration for possible noise, rumble strips were not established in the area where the accident occurred. Based on the investigation, the NSIA considers that rumble strips could have contributed to the driver becoming aware that the car was crossing into the oncoming lane and further given him a possibility to correct this.
The national road norm N302 concerning road marking allows each individual administrative body to decide where reinforced centreline road marking is to be installed, if the speed limit is minimum 70 km/h and the road width is at least 7,5 m. The norm does not mention proximity to housings. The investigation has shown varying practices among different administrative bodies.
Reinforced centreline road marking is a highly cost-effective road safety measure, and the guidelines in the N302 should ensure that the measure is used to the greatest extent possible. Clearer, knowledge-based guidelines in the road norm will help simplify such assessments, for example out of consideration for noise for nearby housings, as well as contribute to a more uniform practice. The NSIA believes that situations where reinforced centreline marking is not installed, although the road design and speed limits allow for this, must be well assessed.
As a result of this investigation, the NSIA issues one safety recommendation related to reinforced centreline marking and road norm N302.
In addition, the NSIA would like to highlight the following learning points for road users:
- Check that seatbelts are correctly tightened by the hip.
- Always use a protective net for luggage when available and install it in accordance with the manufacturer´s instructions.
Published 26.06.2024
Safety recommendation
Safety recommendation Road No 2024/13T
The head on collision between a passenger car and a heavy goods vehicle 27 April 2023 resulted in three fatally and one critically injured. The investigation has shown that reinforced centreline road marking could have made the driver of the passenger car aware that the car was crossing into the oncoming lane and further given him a possibility to correct this. Innlandet County Authority had established reinforced centreline road marking on road fv. 24, but because of the road’s proximity to housings and out of consideration for possible noise, reinforced marking was not established in the area where the accident occurred. The national road norm N302 concerning road markings allows each individual administrative body to decide where reinforced centreline road marking is to be installed. The investigation has shown varying practices among different administrative bodies. Reinforced centreline road marking is a highly cost-effective road safety measure, and the NSIA believes there should be clearer, knowledge-based guidelines in the N302, in such a way that the measure is used to the biggest possible extent.
The Norwegian Safety Investigation Authority recommends that the Norwegian Public Roads Administration review the knowledge and experience base and update the national road norm N302 so that reinforced centreline road marking becomes mandatory, both when establishing a new road and when re-asphalting if the road’s width and speed limit are suitable.
Facts
Location | Fv. 24, Vallset, Stange municipality |
Occurrence date | 27.04.2023 |
Accident type | Head-on collision |
Road class | County road |
County | Innlandet |
Vehicle type | Passenger car, Truck and trailer |
Type of Transportation | Freight transport, Private transport |
Accident category | Ulykke m/ kjøretøy over 7500 kg |